09
2011
04
2011
Olympic Crystal Packing
In the spirit of the 2012 Olympic games. Found at the webpage of the group of Prof. Heinz Neumann, Department for Molecular Structural Biology, Georg-August-University Göttingen. Anyone knows what protein is it?
HT to ravehb for the finding.
26
2011
A PLoS ONE Rosetta Collection
Three articles recently published in PLoS ONE are the harbinger of a RosettaCon 2010 PLoS one collection. How do you design a new enzyme from scratch? How do you model peptide binding with almost no prior information? And what puzzles CAN’T Rosetta solve?
06
2011
Annotatr and The MD Club
Some months ago, Bosco Ho, Molecular Dynamics (MD) boy wonder and HTML5 wiz, contacted a group of scientists, myself included, to start a world wide Journal Club (JC). The subject: Molecular Dynamics, the venue? Annotatr – a mashup of CiteULike and Disqus. The motivation behind Annotatr was to get scientists to comment on articles (lower the energy barrier if you prefer).
Since then the MD JC had several prolific sessions, discussing some great MD papers on which I’ll discuss briefly below, as well as recently, a completely unrelated theoretical evolutionary paper just to broaden our horizons.
09
2010
Use of Molecular Vision in Education
Bob Bateman* and Paul Craig** recently wrote an article entitled, “A Proficiency Rubric for Biomacromolecular 3D Literacy“, for the Education Corner of the PDB newsletter, where they presented three levels of 3D biomolecular literacy: Introductory Biology (novice level), Biochemistry/Cell Biology (amateur level) and Structural Biology Graduate Student (expert level). Together with Lea Michel** their goal is to develop structural biology educational resources for teaching, that will include assessment according to these rubrics.
As a first step, Bob, Paul and Lea are conducting a survey that addresses the uses of molecular visualization in education. The survey includes 11 multiple choice questions and 3 open ended questions. They have included comment boxes on many of the multiple choice questions in case there is not a choice or set of choices that accurately reflects your perspective. In that case, please indicate your choice in the comment box. We anticipate it will take your 15-25 minutes to complete.
Please take this short time to answer the survey (http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/62TL6ZJ) If the response to the survey is good, the plan is to compile the results and submit a manuscript to Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education.
* Bob Bateman is a professor of biochemistry at the University of Southern Mississippi in Hattiesburg, Mississippi.
** Paul Craig and Lea Michel are professors in the Department of Chemistry at the Rochester Institute of Technology in Rochester, NY.
P.s. while you’re at it, you might want to revisit our poll on your favourite macromolecular viewer.
28
2010
Deriving Inhibitory Peptides from Globular Protein–Protein Interactions
There are several forms of peptide-protein interactions, one of which are globular PPIs mediated by a dominant linear peptide at the interface. To what extent could peptides extracted from a globular protein monomer be used to inhibit the interaction to its partner? In this work, we have investigated the possibility of deriving peptides from the interface of globular proteins to design inhibitors that would compete with their native interaction.
(more…)
27
2010
Sub-angstrom modeling of complexes between flexible peptides and globular proteins
We present Rosetta FlexPepDock, a novel tool for refining coarse peptide–protein models that allows significant changes in both peptide backbone and side chains. We obtain high resolution models, often of sub-angstrom backbone quality, over an extensive and general benchmark of 89 peptide–protein interactions.
25
2010
The Structural Basis of Peptide-Protein Binding Strategies
How can peptides overcome the entropic cost involved in switching from an unstructured, flexible peptide to a rigid, well-defined bound structure? What are the strategies used by peptides in? order to bind their protein receptor? How is this different than protein-protein interactions? In this work we performed A structure-based analysis of peptide-protein interactions to try and answer these questions.
24
2010
Introducing Peptide-Protein Interactions
Peptide-protein interactions are a key component of the cellular protein-protein interaction network. These interactions, in which one partner is a globular protein (or domain) and the other is a flexible linear peptide are very prevalent, and play a role in major cellular processes, predominantly in signaling and regulatory networks. Due to their abundance and cardinal role in regulatory interactions, flexible peptides are in many cases implicated in human disease and cancer. Consequently, peptide-protein interactions are gaining much interest of late. The Furman group have recently published a series of papers on the subject of peptide-protein interactions (disclaimer – these were partly authored by yours truly). In this post I will introduce the subject and the motivation to investigate these interactions and in later posts of this ‘mini-series’ I will get into more details on this on-going research.
(more…)
10
2010
Models on the cover
In 2009, an israeli model (Bar Refaeli) had gotten the cover of the sports illustrated special swimsuit issue.
In 2010, an israeli modeler (Yours truly) had gotten the cover of the February issue of “Structure”.
Indeed it’s hard to say which is more sexy. We will of course follow up with an in-depth coverage of the paper (regretably just of the latter).

















