Nov
05
2011
0

A twitter roundup

For those not yet following us (@molmodelblog) on twitter, a roundup of interesting links from the weekend:

Written by admin in: Resources,Title Madness | Tags: ,
Jun
08
2011
1

One Sided De-Novo Computational Design of a Protein-Protein Interaction

In a recent Science paper, Sarel Fleishman et al. report the de-novo computational design of a protein interface to specifically target and tightly bind a surface patch of the flu hemaglutinin protein. We interview Sarel to get the insights from behind the scenes and the outlook for this exciting approach.

(more…)

May
26
2011
2

A PLoS ONE Rosetta Collection

Three articles recently published in PLoS ONE are the harbinger of a RosettaCon 2010 PLoS one collection. How do you design a new enzyme from scratch? How do you model peptide binding with almost no prior information? And what puzzles CAN’T Rosetta solve?

(more…)

May
19
2011
85

A more dynamic literature review

Though I like posting them, and some of the readers like sifting through, the literature reviews always struck me as too static, I wanted to have a more nimble system that can allow readers to comment on a specific paper, to ‘like’ specific papers, and to be able to sort the list this way or another. Following the recent post on Annotator, it came to mind that Disqus might indeed be the answer for a few of these problems. So here is a pilot for this approach, let’s see how it goes. All the titles are posted as comments at the bottom, you can comment/ask questions on specific ones, show appreciation by ‘liking’ them, sort by popularity, moreover – you can add all the ones I missed!

Written by Nir London in: Literature Reviews,Title Madness | Tags:
May
06
2011
2

Annotatr and The MD Club

Some months ago, Bosco Ho, Molecular Dynamics (MD) boy wonder and HTML5 wiz, contacted a group of scientists, myself included, to start a world wide Journal Club (JC). The subject: Molecular Dynamics, the venue? Annotatr – a mashup of CiteULike and Disqus. The motivation behind Annotatr was to get scientists to comment on articles (lower the energy barrier if you prefer).

Since then the MD JC had several prolific sessions, discussing some great MD papers on which I’ll discuss briefly below, as well as recently, a completely unrelated theoretical evolutionary paper just to broaden our horizons.

(more…)

Dec
21
2010
0

Concerted Dynamics Link Allosteric Sites in the PBX Homeodomain

In a recent post in “Discount Thoughts” Michael Clarkson reviews a paper examining the dynamics of allostery in PBX1 homeodomain. Another example for a possible conformational selection binding mechanism.

(more…)

Nov
25
2010
0

Literature Review – Nov.(+Oct.) 2010

As usual, a long absence means two things, lots of work to do, and lots of papers to read. You can find here our pickings from the recent literature. Enjoy.

(more…)

Written by Nir London in: Literature Reviews,Title Madness |
Sep
28
2010
2

Deriving Inhibitory Peptides from Globular Protein–Protein Interactions

There are several forms of peptide-protein interactions, one of which are globular PPIs mediated by a dominant linear peptide at the interface. To what extent could peptides extracted from a globular protein monomer be used to inhibit the interaction to its partner? In this work, we have investigated the possibility of deriving peptides from the interface of globular proteins to design inhibitors that would compete with their native interaction.
(more…)

Sep
27
2010
1

Sub-angstrom modeling of complexes between flexible peptides and globular proteins

We present Rosetta FlexPepDock, a novel tool for refining coarse peptide–protein models that allows significant changes in both peptide backbone and side chains. We obtain high resolution models, often of sub-angstrom backbone quality, over an extensive and general benchmark of 89 peptide–protein interactions.

(more…)

Sep
25
2010
4

The Structural Basis of Peptide-Protein Binding Strategies

How can peptides overcome the entropic cost involved in switching from an unstructured, flexible peptide to a rigid, well-defined bound structure? What are the strategies used by peptides in? order to bind their protein receptor? How is this different than protein-protein interactions? In this work we performed A structure-based analysis of peptide-protein interactions to try and answer these questions.

(more…)

Powered by WordPress | Aeros Theme | TheBuckmaker.com WordPress Themes
© 2009 Rosetta Design Group LLC